In addition, the various stakeholders that are involved in these connections school, family, and community may hold conflicting perceptions of their roles and the roles of other stakeholders. The need to clarify these definitions of family and community connections comes not from a call for a universally acceptable, all-encompassing definition of the terms, but from a need to be clear in our language so that researchers and practitioners can more effectively implement and measure the impact of these connections. This lack of clarity and agreement about what and who is included in the concept of family and community connections with schools creates a challenge for those who seek models that are practicable and yield measurable results. When achieved, however, the rewards will be many, for effective connections can improve student achievement in school, support student success in life, and nurture the development of healthy schools, families, and communities.
At this point in history, America was in turmoil due to internal problems and was in dire need of social reforms. The progressive era was like a golden age for intellectuals who strived to create a nation where each citizen could be given a chance at success and involvement in the government. In the latter portion of the s, America faced an economic depression and encountered problems with industrialization, urbanization, and immigration.
Some progressives demanded that the government should be run directly by its people and that the quality of city life should be ameliorated through sanitation improvements, the abolition of child labor, and regulated working hours.
Americas utmost problem, however, proved to be the overwhelming power that trusts and big business held in the nation. This factor had a leading role in the development of the era of progressivism. In general, progressives basically agreed that trusts must be destroyed; however, there were different solutions among the progressives on the correct remedy to solve this problem.
One ideology in the progressive era called the New Nationalism, advocated for an increase of government involvement in order to regulate big businesses. The other ideology called the New Freedom, firmly believed the big in business was the threat to American society; therefore, the role of the government should be to break up trusts and monopolies.
Whatever may have been the case, the progressives desired to attack any group of concentrated power in order to bring more accountability to the government of America. Although the progressives had good intentions to reform the nation, some historians, such as Richard M.
Abrams, author of The Failure of Progressivism, believe the entire movement was a complete failure. On the other hand, other historians, such as Arthur S. Link and Richard L. McCormick beg to differ with Abrams and defiantly defend their own belief in their article entitled Progressivism in History that the movement was indeed successful.
After closely reading both of the articles mentioned above, I have come to the conclusion that Abramss argument proves to be stronger in that it is not as biased and seems to be more sensible than that of Links and McCormicks.
In the article, The Failure of Progressivism, Professor Richard Abrams argues that the entire progressive movement was a failure. First, Abrams initially defines what he believes to have been progressivism by concluding that the progressives expressed a common feeling that government should attempt to moralize the lives of its citizens through a series of reforms.
According to Abrams, its followers flowered from various groups including female emancipationists, prohibitionists, the social gospel, conservation advocates, businessmen, and intellectuals. The progressives generally advocated for an efficient government that would implement strict moral values upon its people.
Although most people in America had the same views as progressives, Abrams claims that [the progressives] also conceived of themselves, with a grand sense of stewardship, as its heralds, and its agents. He states that the progressives mainly wanted to instill old moral values upon Americans by attempting to assimilate immigrants by forcing them to accept the American way of life.
Additionally, they wanted to impose antitrust legislation, job reforms, and direct legislation. However, according to Abrams these goals were tarnished for significant reasons.
First of all, the movement failed due to racism that was rampant during this time period. In addition to racism among blacks in the south, anti-Catholicism started appearing throughout the country. According to Abrams, racism hindered the motives of progressivism because there was the inability of reform to deliver a meaningful share of the social surplus to the groups left out of the general national progress, and in part the inability of reform to achieve its objective of assimilation and consensus.
Suddenly, different ethnic groups such as the African Americans took a more aggressive approach towards the public to finally stand up for their rights, which further contributed to growing animosity. Moreover, Abrams believes that new scientific developments regarding race and culture affected the movement in.Progressivism: Opposing Viewpoints essaysAt the commencement of the twentieth century, a period referred to as progressivism swept through America.
Precisely, this era in American history began soon after the Spanish-American War and lasted until the beginning of World War I.
At this point in hist. The Opposing Viewpoints on the Concept of Progressivism PAGES 3. WORDS 2, View Full Essay. More essays like this: concept of progressivism, spanish american war, opposing viewpoints. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.
Exactly what I needed.
It looks like you've lost connection to our server. Please check your internet connection or reload this page. Stakeholders (educators, parents, community members, students) may have opposing viewpoints about what constitutes involvement and what their roles should be. For instance, Scribner, Young, and Pedroza () found that teachers tend to define parent involvement differently than parents do. Today, the idea that a person can be both condemned for their corruption as well as praised for their heroism seems to be regarded as mutually exclusive. All across our nation, memorials and statues of Confederate soldiers are being protested, covered and destroyed, often violently. The rationale behind this movement.
Opposing viewpoints that industrial leaders were either beneficial for the economy or wielded power without any accountability in an unregulated market.
''The Significance of the Frontier in American History'. Progressivism. Progressivism was an era that desired movement toward reform; it was not single instance but based on a series of advancements.
With a new urban-industrial American on deck came the socioeconomic challenges of every day life. At a basic level, it was a response to the political and cultural changes that plagued the nation, the challenges as side effect of an industrial society.
It looks like you've lost connection to our server. Please check your internet connection or reload this page. Progressivism: Opposing Viewpoints At the commencement of the twentieth century, a period referred to as progressivism swept through America.
Precisely, this era in American history began soon after the Spanish-American War and lasted until the beginning of World War I. At this point in his.